Files changed

• .milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_3/

Briefing

You are the Software Solution Architect Agent.

Based on the rules you must follow in the file .milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_architect.md,
generate the coding-agent prompts for work item DEPLOY_BUG_3 of EPIC_2
(section 10 of your rules for a bug, section 10a for a FIX item).

Specification — this is what your prompts must make true:
.milkyflow/agents/devops/reports/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_3.md

This is a DEFECT report, and it is a work item of the EPIC — not of any user story. Its
"Steps to reproduce" and "Expected result" are the specification: QA will re-execute those
steps literally to validate your fix, so the work must make the Expected result hold from a
clean state. Its "## Detected during" field is informational only — never derive a story id,
a path, or any routing decision from it.

Do NOT create a story file for this work item, do NOT write into the Product Owner's
directory, and never consume a US_$j number. Do not edit the report itself: it belongs to the
agent that produced it, and its occurrence history is that agent's record.

Save the prompts under .milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_3/,
one file per task, numbered in execution order, as your rules specify. Generate prompts for
DEPLOY_BUG_3 only — every other work item waits for the QA verdict on this one.

Output

» You are the Software Solution Architect Agent.

Based on the rules you must follow in the file .milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_architect.md,
generate the coding-agent prompts for work item DEPLOY_BUG_3 of EPIC_2
(section 10 of your rules for a bug, section 10a for a FIX item).

Specification — this is what your prompts must make true:
.milkyflow/agents/devops/reports/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_3.md

This is a DEFECT report, and it is a work item of the EPIC — not of any user story. Its
"Steps to reproduce" and "Expected result" are the specification: QA will re-execute those
steps literally to validate your fix, so the work must make the Expected result hold from a
clean state. Its "## Detected during" field is informational only — never derive a story id,
a path, or any routing decision from it.

Do NOT create a story file for this work item, do NOT write into the Product Owner's
directory, and never consume a US_$j number. Do not edit the report itself: it belongs to the
agent that produced it, and its occurrence history is that agent's record.

Save the prompts under .milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_3/,
one file per task, numbered in execution order, as your rules specify. Generate prompts for
DEPLOY_BUG_3 only — every other work item waits for the QA verdict on this one.
… Let me read the relevant files first.
[tool] bash {'command': 'cat /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution
… Let me read the relevant files first.
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_archit
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/devops/reports/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_3.md'}
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_archit
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_archit
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_archit
Now let me inspect the provision script to understand the current code:
[tool] bash {'command': 'cat -n /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/local/fixtures/provision-pc-fixture.sh | head -1
[tool] bash {'command': 'ls /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/ 2>/dev/null && 
[tool] bash {'command': 'cat -n /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/local/fixtures/provision-pc-fixture.sh | tail -3
[tool] bash {'command': 'find /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/local/fixtures -type f | sort', 'description': 'Li
… Now I have enough context. Let me look at what PasswordCockpit API provides for clearing the changePasswordNextLogin flag. Looking at the bug report, the issue is:
1. Sub-defect A: Line 126 uses literal `******` instead of `${ADMIN_TOKEN}` 
2. Sub-defect B: The `changePasswordNextLogin` field doesn't work with PUT /api/v1/users/{id}

For Sub-defect B, the developer needs to discover the correct PasswordCockpit API endpoint/parameter. Let me check the docker-compose file to understand the PasswordCockpit version being used.
[tool] bash {'command': 'cat /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/local/fixtures/docker-compose.pc-fixture.yml', 'des
Now I have all the context I need. Let me create the prompt files:
… Now I have enough context. Let me look at what PasswordCockpit API provides for clearing the changePasswordNextLogin flag. Looking at the bug report, the issue is:
1. Sub-defect A: Line 126 uses literal `******` instead of `${ADMIN_TOKEN}` 
2. Sub-defect B: The `changePasswordNextLogin` field doesn't work with PUT /api/v1/users/{id}

For Sub-defect B, the developer needs to discover the correct PasswordCockpit API endpoint/parameter. Let me check the docker-compose file to understand the PasswordCockpit version being used.
[tool] bash {'command': 'mkdir -p /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEP
[tool] create {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_3/1_
[tool] create {'file_text': '# Coding Task — FIX_PROVISION_SCRIPT_STEP_2B\n\n## Mandatory rules\n\nBefore starting, read and follow:\n
[tool] bash {'command': 'ls /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BU
Two prompts generated under `.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_3/`:

---

**Task 1 — `1_INVESTIGATE_PC_CHANGE_PASSWORD_API.md`**
Investigation-only task. The coder must inspect the PasswordCockpit 1.4.0 backend source on GitHub to find the accepted field name / endpoint that actually persists `change_password = false`, then validate the finding with a live curl call against the fixture. The result is documented in the answer file — no code changes.

**Task 2 — `2_FIX_PROVISION_SCRIPT_STEP_2B.md`**
Depends on task 1's answer. Fixes both sub-defects in `local/fixtures/provision-pc-fixture.sh`:
- **Sub-defect A**: replaces every `Authorization: ******` (4 occurrences — Steps 2, 2b, 3, 4) with `Authorization: Bearer ${ADMIN_TOKEN}`.
- **Sub-defect B**: applies the correct endpoint/field name discovered in task 1.

Validation: clean `down -v` → `up -d` → `provision-pc-fixture.sh` exits 0 → readiness check reports `write_permission PASS` / `Overall: READY`.
[done] exit=0 premium_requests=1 api=138435ms