Files changed

• .milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_BUG_1.md
• .milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_BUG_1_PASS.md
• .milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_BUG_2.md
• .milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_US_2_BLOCKED.md

Briefing

You are the QA Agent.

Based on the rules you must follow in the file .milkyflow/agents/qa/rules_qa_agent.md,
validate work item BUG_1 of EPIC_2 — section 3b of your rules, which this
briefing follows exactly.

Specification (your test script):
.milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_BUG_1.md

Where to reach the app and test accounts: the "Endpoints" and "Access" sections of
.milkyflow/agents/devops/prompts/EPIC_2_BUG_1/DEPLOY_CONFIG_2.md
Precondition: .milkyflow/agents/devops/answers/EPIC_2_BUG_1/DEPLOY_CONFIG_2.md
exists and reports READY. If it does not, stop and report: there is no deployed environment.

Do NOT read the developer answer files or any completion report before testing — they
describe what was claimed, and reading them first biases the test.

**Part 1 — the defect is gone.**
Follow the report's "Steps to reproduce" literally, from a clean state. Its "Expected result"
must now hold. Record the verdict per step: PASS / FAIL / BLOCKED.

**Part 2 — the interrupted work is actually complete.**
On the SAME deployment, in this same session, identify the interrupted work item yourself —
nothing on disk records it:

- the epic's first US_$j, in the order stated in
  .milkyflow/agents/product_owner/EPIC_2/epic.md, that has NO pass document at
  .milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_US_$j_PASS.md;
- if every planned story has one, the epic is in its e2e phase: re-execute the e2e plan's
  failed test plus every test the interrupted run never reached.

Execute that item's specification IN FULL — every acceptance criterion, not only the ones
that failed before. You are establishing that it is complete, not that one symptom moved.

**Verdicts (section 6).** This session can close TWO work items:

- defect gone AND every criterion of the interrupted story passed →
  create .milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_BUG_1_PASS.md AND
  .milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_US_$j_PASS.md for that story.
  In the same write, flip the bug report's `Status:` marker to `CLOSED`.
- defect gone, but the interrupted story reveals a DIFFERENT failure → the work item's pass
  document only, plus a NEW bug report (section 5: "## Bug Occurrence" 1, no
  "## Previous occurrence"). Never write a pass document for a story whose criteria did not
  all pass in THIS session.
- the SAME defect is still present → no pass document. Follow the repeat-defect rule of
  section 5: read the previous report's "## Bug Occurrence", and either raise a new report
  with the count incremented and a "## Previous occurrence" link, or — once the threshold in
  `qa.max_bug_occurrences` (default 3) is reached — stop creating reports, write
  .milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_BUG_1_BLOCKED.md listing the whole
  chain, and escalate to the Project Manager as a category D blocker.

Cite DEPLOY_CONFIG_2 and the deployment answer in every report's Environment
section. The DevOps Agent tears the environment down after your verdict, whatever it is.

Output

» You are the QA Agent.

Based on the rules you must follow in the file .milkyflow/agents/qa/rules_qa_agent.md,
validate work item BUG_1 of EPIC_2 — section 3b of your rules, which this
briefing follows exactly.

Specification (your test script):
.milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_BUG_1.md

Where to reach the app and test accounts: the "Endpoints" and "Access" sections of
.milkyflow/agents/devops/prompts/EPIC_2_BUG_1/DEPLOY_CONFIG_2.md
Precondition: .milkyflow/agents/devops/answers/EPIC_2_BUG_1/DEPLOY_CONFIG_2.md
exists and reports READY. If it does not, stop and report: there is no deployed environment.

Do NOT read the developer answer files or any completion report before testing — they
describe what was claimed, and reading them first biases the test.

**Part 1 — the defect is gone.**
Follow the report's "Steps to reproduce" literally, from a clean state. Its "Expected result"
must now hold. Record the verdict per step: PASS / FAIL / BLOCKED.

**Part 2 — the interrupted work is actually complete.**
On the SAME deployment, in this same session, identify the interrupted work item yourself —
nothing on disk records it:

- the epic's first US_$j, in the order stated in
  .milkyflow/agents/product_owner/EPIC_2/epic.md, that has NO pass document at
  .milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_US_$j_PASS.md;
- if every planned story has one, the epic is in its e2e phase: re-execute the e2e plan's
  failed test plus every test the interrupted run never reached.

Execute that item's specification IN FULL — every acceptance criterion, not only the ones
that failed before. You are establishing that it is complete, not that one symptom moved.

**Verdicts (section 6).** This session can close TWO work items:

- defect gone AND every criterion of the interrupted story passed →
  create .milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_BUG_1_PASS.md AND
  .milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_US_$j_PASS.md for that story.
  In the same write, flip the bug report's `Status:` marker to `CLOSED`.
- defect gone, but the interrupted story reveals a DIFFERENT failure → the work item's pass
  document only, plus a NEW bug report (section 5: "## Bug Occurrence" 1, no
  "## Previous occurrence"). Never write a pass document for a story whose criteria did not
  all pass in THIS session.
- the SAME defect is still present → no pass document. Follow the repeat-defect rule of
  section 5: read the previous report's "## Bug Occurrence", and either raise a new report
  with the count incremented and a "## Previous occurrence" link, or — once the threshold in
  `qa.max_bug_occurrences` (default 3) is reached — stop creating reports, write
  .milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_BUG_1_BLOCKED.md listing the whole
  chain, and escalate to the Project Manager as a category D blocker.

Cite DEPLOY_CONFIG_2 and the deployment answer in every report's Environment
section. The DevOps Agent tears the environment down after your verdict, whatever it is.
… Let me start by reading the necessary files to understand my task.
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/devops/answers/EPIC_2_BUG_1/DEPLOY_CONFI
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/qa/rules_qa_agent.md'}
Precondition confirmed: deployment answer exists and reports **READY**. Now let me read the bug report and epic files.
… Let me start by reading the necessary files to understand my task.
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_BUG_1.md'}
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/product_owner/EPIC_2/epic.md'}
[tool] glob {'pattern': '.milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_US_*_PASS.md'}
US_1 has a PASS document. Let me check US_2:
[tool] glob {'pattern': '.milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_US_2_PASS.md'}
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/devops/prompts/EPIC_2_BUG_1/DEPLOY_CONFI
US_2 has no PASS document — that's the interrupted story. Now let me read US_2 spec and check the environment:
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/product_owner/EPIC_2/US_2.md'}
[tool] bash {'command': 'cd /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper && docker compose -f local/fixtures/docker-compose.p
Fixture is healthy. Now let me run Part 1 — reproduce the BUG_1 steps:
[tool] bash {'command': 'cd /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper && source .venv/bin/activate && PC_FIXTURE_USERNAME=
**BUG_1 Step 2:** PASS — `http://` URL accepted, no "base_url must start with 'https://'" error.
[tool] bash {'command': 'cd /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper && source .venv/bin/activate && backup-cockpit live-
**BUG_1 Steps 3–6:** PASS — `network_reachable`, `auth_ok`, `write_permission` all PASS; Overall: READY.

**Part 1 verdict: PASS — defect is gone.**

Now Part 2 — US_2 full validation. I need to understand what CLI commands exist for import:
[tool] bash {'command': 'cd /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper && source .venv/bin/activate && backup-cockpit --hel
[tool] bash {'command': 'cd /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper && source .venv/bin/activate && backup-cockpit live-
There's no `live-import run` or import trigger command. Let me check what's in the codebase:
… Let me start by reading the necessary files to understand my task.
[tool] bash {'command': 'cd /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper && find src -name "*.py" | xargs grep -l "import.*ru
… Let me start by reading the necessary files to understand my task.
[tool] bash {'command': 'cd /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper && find src -name "*.py" | xargs grep -l "root_folde
… Let me understand the structure — there is no `run` subcommand for `live-import`. The CLI only has `destination` management. US_2 acceptance criteria involve "when the operator runs the import for source-a" — this implies there's an import run command. The spec says "Expected components touched" includes "import orchestrator, root-folder bootstrap phase".

As a black-box QA agent, I should not look at the code. I should test through the user-facing interface (CLI). If there's no `backup-cockpit live-import run` command or equivalent, I cannot execute US_2's AC1 through AC5, and I must report BLOCKED.
[tool] bash {'command': 'cd /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper && source .venv/bin/activate && backup-cockpit live-
The `backup-cockpit` CLI has no `live-import run` command. US_2's acceptance criteria require running an import for a source server — a user-facing capability that does not exist in the deployed CLI. All five ACs are BLOCKED at the `When` step.

Let me also check what source registration commands look like:
… Let me understand the structure — there is no `run` subcommand for `live-import`. The CLI only has `destination` management. US_2 acceptance criteria involve "when the operator runs the import for source-a" — this implies there's an import run command. The spec says "Expected components touched" includes "import orchestrator, root-folder bootstrap phase".

As a black-box QA agent, I should not look at the code. I should test through the user-facing interface (CLI). If there's no `backup-cockpit live-import run` command or equivalent, I cannot execute US_2's AC1 through AC5, and I must report BLOCKED.
[tool] bash {'command': 'cd /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper && source .venv/bin/activate && backup-cockpit raw-c
The CLI has no `live-import run` command, so all AC1–AC5 of US_2 are BLOCKED at the When step (no import trigger exists in the application). This is an application-level missing feature → bug report required.

Let me get the timestamp and write all artifacts:
… OK, so there is source management (from EPIC_1), but no `live-import run` command exists. The US_2 acceptance criteria all require "runs the import for source-a" which is a `live-import run source-a` or similar command — that does not exist. All AC1–AC5 are BLOCKED because the `When` action cannot be performed: there is no import run command.

This is an application-level missing feature, not an environment issue. It's a FAIL (missing functionality), and since there's no way to exercise any of the ACs, all are BLOCKED.

Wait — the QA rules say:
- FAIL: the application behaves incorrectly
- BLOCKED: could not set up the Given state

I can set up the Given state (register destination, readiness check passes), but I can't perform the When action because the import command doesn't exist. That makes each AC BLOCKED — the When is unexecutable. This is an application-level missing feature, not an environment problem, so I should file a bug report.

Actually, this goes beyond a bug — US_2 is simply incomplete. The import run command was never implemented as part of the story. BUG_1 (the http:// rejection) is fixed, but now US_2 is blocked because the CLI lacks the import run command entirely. So I need to mark BUG_1 as fixed, create a BLOCKED document for US_2 since the ACs couldn't be executed, and skip creating a PASS document for US_2. Let me check the rules again to confirm how to handle this situation. the appropriate blocked document. Since the When actions can't be executed due to the missing import run command, all acceptance criteria are blocked — this is an application-level issue that needs to be reported as a bug. I'm planning to create the pass document for BUG_1, close that work item, write a blocked document for US_2, and file a new bug for the missing live-import run command. Though I'm second-guessing whether the absence of that command is actually a bug or just unimplemented functionality since US_2 was the next story the developer hadn't gotten to yet before BUG_1 was discovered during US_1 testing.

Looking back at the BUG_1 report, it was detected during US_1 AC2 validation, and US_1 already has its pass document. US_2 is the interrupted story without a pass document, and since the application doesn't expose an import trigger for live-import, there's no way to validate any of US_2's acceptance criteria — they're all blocked.

Now I need to document this: write the pass document for BUG_1 and close that work item, create a blocked document for US_2, and then determine whether the missing import command should be tracked as a separate bug. The rules say application-level issues become bug work items, and whether this was never implemented or removed, the behavior doesn't match the spec either way. I'll create the blocked document first.

Actually, looking more carefully at the Given setup for US_2 — I can establish the preconditions (registered destination, passed readiness, registered source, no conflicting folder). The real issue is that when I try to execute the When step (run the import), there's no command available in the application to trigger it. That's what makes this BLOCKED rather than a different status — the When itself can't be executed because the interface doesn't provide the mechanism.
[tool] bash {'command': 'date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ', 'description': 'Get UTC timestamp'}
… OK, so there is source management (from EPIC_1), but no `live-import run` command exists. The US_2 acceptance criteria all require "runs the import for source-a" which is a `live-import run source-a` or similar command — that does not exist. All AC1–AC5 are BLOCKED because the `When` action cannot be performed: there is no import run command.

This is an application-level missing feature, not an environment issue. It's a FAIL (missing functionality), and since there's no way to exercise any of the ACs, all are BLOCKED.

Wait — the QA rules say:
- FAIL: the application behaves incorrectly
- BLOCKED: could not set up the Given state

I can set up the Given state (register destination, readiness check passes), but I can't perform the When action because the import command doesn't exist. That makes each AC BLOCKED — the When is unexecutable. This is an application-level missing feature, not an environment problem, so I should file a bug report.

Actually, this goes beyond a bug — US_2 is simply incomplete. The import run command was never implemented as part of the story. BUG_1 (the http:// rejection) is fixed, but now US_2 is blocked because the CLI lacks the import run command entirely. So I need to mark BUG_1 as fixed, create a BLOCKED document for US_2 since the ACs couldn't be executed, and skip creating a PASS document for US_2. Let me check the rules again to confirm how to handle this situation. the appropriate blocked document. Since the When actions can't be executed due to the missing import run command, all acceptance criteria are blocked — this is an application-level issue that needs to be reported as a bug. I'm planning to create the pass document for BUG_1, close that work item, write a blocked document for US_2, and file a new bug for the missing live-import run command. Though I'm second-guessing whether the absence of that command is actually a bug or just unimplemented functionality since US_2 was the next story the developer hadn't gotten to yet before BUG_1 was discovered during US_1 testing.

Looking back at the BUG_1 report, it was detected during US_1 AC2 validation, and US_1 already has its pass document. US_2 is the interrupted story without a pass document, and since the application doesn't expose an import trigger for live-import, there's no way to validate any of US_2's acceptance criteria — they're all blocked.

Now I need to document this: write the pass document for BUG_1 and close that work item, create a blocked document for US_2, and then determine whether the missing import command should be tracked as a separate bug. The rules say application-level issues become bug work items, and whether this was never implemented or removed, the behavior doesn't match the spec either way. I'll create the blocked document first.

Actually, looking more carefully at the Given setup for US_2 — I can establish the preconditions (registered destination, passed readiness, registered source, no conflicting folder). The real issue is that when I try to execute the When step (run the import), there's no command available in the application to trigger it. That's what makes this BLOCKED rather than a different status — the When itself can't be executed because the interface doesn't provide the mechanism.
[tool] glob {'pattern': '.milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_BUG_*.md'}
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/history.md'}
[tool] bash {'command': 'tail -5 /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/history.md', 'description': '
Now I'll write all artifacts. Summary:
- **Part 1 (BUG_1):** PASS — http:// registration accepted; readiness check READY
- **Part 2 (US_2):** All 5 ACs BLOCKED — no `live-import run` command exists in the CLI
… Now I have everything I need. Let me write all the artifacts:

1. EPIC_2_BUG_1_PASS.md
2. Update EPIC_2_BUG_1.md Status: CLOSED
3. EPIC_2_BUG_2.md (new bug: no live-import run command exists)
4. EPIC_2_US_2_BLOCKED.md
5. Append to history.md

The rules say "defect gone, but the interrupted story reveals a DIFFERENT failure → the work item's pass document only, plus a NEW bug report"

So:
- Create EPIC_2_BUG_1_PASS.md ✓
- Flip EPIC_2_BUG_1 Status to CLOSED ✓
- Create EPIC_2_BUG_2.md (new bug for missing live-import run command) ✓
- Create EPIC_2_US_2_BLOCKED.md ✓

Actually, wait—re-reading the verdicts section more carefully: "the work item's pass document only" means I should create only BUG_1_PASS.md, not US_2_PASS.md. The new bug report covers the different failure that emerged. No US_2_PASS needed.
[tool] create {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_BUG_1_PASS.md', 'file_
… Now I have everything I need. Let me write all the artifacts:

1. EPIC_2_BUG_1_PASS.md
2. Update EPIC_2_BUG_1.md Status: CLOSED
3. EPIC_2_BUG_2.md (new bug: no live-import run command exists)
4. EPIC_2_US_2_BLOCKED.md
5. Append to history.md

The rules say "defect gone, but the interrupted story reveals a DIFFERENT failure → the work item's pass document only, plus a NEW bug report"

So:
- Create EPIC_2_BUG_1_PASS.md ✓
- Flip EPIC_2_BUG_1 Status to CLOSED ✓
- Create EPIC_2_BUG_2.md (new bug for missing live-import run command) ✓
- Create EPIC_2_US_2_BLOCKED.md ✓

Actually, wait—re-reading the verdicts section more carefully: "the work item's pass document only" means I should create only BUG_1_PASS.md, not US_2_PASS.md. The new bug report covers the different failure that emerged. No US_2_PASS needed.
[tool] edit {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_BUG_1.md', 'old_str': 
[tool] create {'file_text': '# Bug Report — EPIC_2_BUG_2\n\nStatus: OPEN\n\n## Date\n\n2026-08-08T20:45:43Z\n\n## Bug Occurrence\n\n1\
[tool] create {'file_text': '# Validation Report — EPIC_2 US_2 — NOT VALIDATED\n\n## Date\n\n2026-08-08T20:45:43Z\n\n## Environment\n\
Now append to history.md (timestamp already obtained: `2026-08-08T20:45:43Z`):
[tool] bash {'command': 'echo "| $(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ) | QA — QA Agent | bug_validation | {\\"epic_id\\": \\"EPIC_2\\", \\"
All done. Here is the session summary:

---

## QA Session — EPIC_2 BUG_1 — 2026-08-08

### Part 1 — BUG_1 Defect Validation

| Step | Verdict | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Step 2 — Register with `http://` URL | **PASS** | `Destination 'fixture-dest' registered. URL: http://localhost:8088`; exit 0; no scheme-validation error |
| Step 3 — Exit code | **PASS** | exit 0 |
| Step 5–6 — Readiness check | **PASS** | `network_reachable PASS`, `auth_ok PASS`, `write_permission PASS`; Overall: READY; exit 0 |

**BUG_1 is gone.** → `EPIC_2_BUG_1_PASS.md` created; `EPIC_2_BUG_1.md` flipped to `Status: CLOSED`.

---

### Part 2 — Interrupted Story: US_2

First story without a PASS document: **US_2** (root folder management). All 5 ACs are **BLOCKED**: the CLI has no `live-import run` command. `backup-cockpit live-import --help` exposes only `destination` (register, readiness-check, remove). The import trigger required by every US_2 When clause does not exist.

- `EPIC_2_US_2_BLOCKED.md` created
- `EPIC_2_BUG_2.md` opened (Blocking — missing `live-import run` CLI entry point)

The DevOps Agent may now tear down the environment.
[done] exit=0 premium_requests=1 api=185978ms