Files changed

• .milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_BUG_2/1_DATA_LAYER_RUN_AND_ROOT_FOLDER_MAPPING.md
• .milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_BUG_2/2_CLIENT_EXTENSIONS_AND_ROOT_FOLDER_BOOTSTRAP_SERVICE.md
• .milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_BUG_2/3_CLI_RUN_SUBCOMMAND_AND_INTEGRATION_TESTS.md

Briefing

You are the Software Solution Architect Agent.

Based on the rules you must follow in the file .milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_architect.md,
generate the coding-agent prompts for work item BUG_2 of EPIC_2
(section 10 of your rules for a bug, section 10a for a FIX item).

Specification — this is what your prompts must make true:
.milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_BUG_2.md

This is a DEFECT report, and it is a work item of the EPIC — not of any user story. Its
"Steps to reproduce" and "Expected result" are the specification: QA will re-execute those
steps literally to validate your fix, so the work must make the Expected result hold from a
clean state. Its "## Detected during" field is informational only — never derive a story id,
a path, or any routing decision from it.

Do NOT create a story file for this work item, do NOT write into the Product Owner's
directory, and never consume a US_$j number. Do not edit the report itself: it belongs to the
agent that produced it, and its occurrence history is that agent's record.

Save the prompts under .milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_BUG_2/,
one file per task, numbered in execution order, as your rules specify. Generate prompts for
BUG_2 only — every other work item waits for the QA verdict on this one.

Output

» You are the Software Solution Architect Agent.

Based on the rules you must follow in the file .milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_architect.md,
generate the coding-agent prompts for work item BUG_2 of EPIC_2
(section 10 of your rules for a bug, section 10a for a FIX item).

Specification — this is what your prompts must make true:
.milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_BUG_2.md

This is a DEFECT report, and it is a work item of the EPIC — not of any user story. Its
"Steps to reproduce" and "Expected result" are the specification: QA will re-execute those
steps literally to validate your fix, so the work must make the Expected result hold from a
clean state. Its "## Detected during" field is informational only — never derive a story id,
a path, or any routing decision from it.

Do NOT create a story file for this work item, do NOT write into the Product Owner's
directory, and never consume a US_$j number. Do not edit the report itself: it belongs to the
agent that produced it, and its occurrence history is that agent's record.

Save the prompts under .milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_BUG_2/,
one file per task, numbered in execution order, as your rules specify. Generate prompts for
BUG_2 only — every other work item waits for the QA verdict on this one.
… Let me read the necessary files to understand the rules and the bug report.
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_archit
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/qa/reports/EPIC_2_BUG_2.md'}
… Let me read the necessary files to understand the rules and the bug report.
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_archit
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_archit
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_archit
Now let me inspect the existing codebase to understand the structure:
[tool] bash {'command': 'find /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/components -name "*.py" | grep -i "live.import\\|l
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts'}
[tool] bash {'command': 'find /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/components/backup_cockpit -name "*.py" | head -40 
[tool] bash {'command': 'find /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper -name "*.py" | grep -v __pycache__ | sort | head -
[tool] bash {'command': 'find /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper -name "*.py" | grep -v __pycache__ | grep -v ".mil
[tool] bash {'command': 'find /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src -name "*.py" 2>/dev/null | sort | head -60 ; f
[tool] bash {'command': 'cat /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src/backup_cockpit/live_import/cli/commands.py && e
… Let me read the necessary files to understand the rules and the bug report.
[tool] bash {'command': 'wc -l /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src/backup_cockpit/live_import/cli/commands.py /h
… Let me read the necessary files to understand the rules and the bug report.
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src/backup_cockpit/live_import/cli/commands.py'}
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src/backup_cockpit/raw_capture/cli/commands.py', 'view_ran
Now let me read the `raw-capture run` command and related live_import domain models to understand the full picture:
… Let me read the raw_capture run command and related files to understand what kind of patterns I should follow.
[tool] bash {'command': 'grep -n "run\\|def _cmd_run" /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src/backup_cockpit/raw_cap
[tool] bash {'command': 'cat /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src/backup_cockpit/live_import/domain/models.py && 
Now let me look at US_2 and the existing EPIC_2 context:
… Now let me look at the EPIC_2 user story 2 to understand what US_2 AC1-AC5 require:
[tool] bash {'command': 'cat /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/product_owner/EPIC_2/US_2.md 2>/d
[tool] bash {'command': 'cat /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src/backup_cockpit/live_import/persistence/reposito
… Now I have enough context to generate the prompts. The bug is clear: there is no `backup-cockpit live-import run <source-id>` command. The `live-import` subcommand group only has `destination`. 

The fix requires:
1. Creating a `run` subcommand under `live-import` in the CLI
2. Implementing the import orchestration (root-folder bootstrap) since that's what the run command would trigger

Looking at US_2, the `run` command needs to:
- Create root folder in destination if not exists
- Record mapping source-id → destination folder ID in SQLite
[tool] bash {'command': 'find /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src/backup_cockpit/live_import -name "*.py" | xarg
[tool] bash {'command': 'cat /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src/backup_cockpit/live_import/clients/passwordcock
… Now I have enough context to generate the prompts. The bug is clear: there is no `backup-cockpit live-import run <source-id>` command. The `live-import` subcommand group only has `destination`. 

The fix requires:
1. Creating a `run` subcommand under `live-import` in the CLI
2. Implementing the import orchestration (root-folder bootstrap) since that's what the run command would trigger

Looking at US_2, the `run` command needs to:
- Create root folder in destination if not exists
- Record mapping source-id → destination folder ID in SQLite
[tool] bash {'command': 'wc -l /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src/backup_cockpit/live_import/clients/passwordco
Now I have sufficient context. Let me read the README and existing tests structure briefly:
… I have enough context now. The bug is clear: there is no `backup-cockpit live-import run <source-id>` command. The `live-import` subcommand group only has `destination`. 

The fix requires:
1. Extending the client with folder create/list-by-name operations for root folder bootstrap
2. Adding domain models and errors for run state, root folder mapping
3. Implementing the root folder bootstrap service/orchestrator
4. Adding the `run` subcommand to the `live-import` CLI
5. Writing tests

I'm thinking
[tool] bash {'command': 'find /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/tests -name "*.py" | sort && echo "---" && ls /hom
[tool] bash {'command': 'head -80 /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/README.md', 'description': 'Read root README'}
Now I have full context. Let me create the prompt directory and write the three task prompts:
… Now I have enough context to write the prompts. This is a single-component change (backup_cockpit), specifically within the `live_import` subsystem. The fix requires:

1. **Task 1 (Data layer)**: Add domain models for `ImportRun` and `RootFolderMapping`, ORM, repository, and Alembic migration for new tables (`live_import_runs`, `live_import_root_folder_mappings`).

2. **Task 2 (Client + Service layer)**: Extend `PasswordCockpitDestinationClient` to list root-level folders by name and create root-level folders.
[tool] bash {'command': 'mkdir -p /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_BUG
… Now I have enough context to write the prompts. This is a single-component change (backup_cockpit), specifically within the `live_import` subsystem. The fix requires:

1. **Task 1 (Data layer)**: Add domain models for `ImportRun` and `RootFolderMapping`, ORM, repository, and Alembic migration for new tables (`live_import_runs`, `live_import_root_folder_mappings`).

2. **Task 2 (Client + Service layer)**: Extend `PasswordCockpitDestinationClient` to list root-level folders by name and create root-level folders.
[tool] create {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_BUG_2/1_DATA_LA
[tool] create {'file_text': '# Coding Task — CLIENT_EXTENSIONS_AND_ROOT_FOLDER_BOOTSTRAP_SERVICE\n\n## Mandatory rules\n\nBefore start
[tool] create {'file_text': '# Coding Task — CLI_RUN_SUBCOMMAND_AND_INTEGRATION_TESTS\n\n## Mandatory rules\n\nBefore starting, read a
Let me verify the output:
… Now let me verify the prompts are in place and confirm the structure.
[tool] bash {'command': 'ls -la /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_BUG_2
Three prompts generated under `.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_BUG_2/`:

| # | File | What it does |
|---|------|-------------|
| 1 | `1_DATA_LAYER_RUN_AND_ROOT_FOLDER_MAPPING.md` | Domain models (`ImportRunRecord`, `RootFolderMappingRecord`), ORM (`live_import_runs`, `live_import_root_folder_mappings`), repositories, Alembic migration |
| 2 | `2_CLIENT_EXTENSIONS_AND_ROOT_FOLDER_BOOTSTRAP_SERVICE.md` | `PasswordCockpitDestinationClient` extensions (`list_root_folders`, `create_root_folder`) + `RootFolderBootstrapService` (idempotent create/recover) + `ImportRunOrchestrator` |
| 3 | `3_CLI_RUN_SUBCOMMAND_AND_INTEGRATION_TESTS.md` | `backup-cockpit live-import run <SOURCE_ID>` command wired into `build_live_import_subparser()`, unit tests for the handler, and integration tests covering AC1/AC2/AC5 |

**Design rationale:**
- The bug is a missing CLI surface + missing orchestration layer. The three tasks map cleanly to data → service → CLI, each independently testable.
- AC1–AC5 from US_2 are exercised by the integration tests in Task 3; QA can re-run them literally from the bug report's "Expected result" steps.
- Token/password locality and `_sanitise()` invariants are carried through all three layers.
… Now let me verify the prompts are in place and confirm the structure.
[done] exit=0 premium_requests=1 api=317206ms