Files changed

• .milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_4/1_FIX_AUTH_HEADER_FSTRING.md

Briefing

You are the Software Solution Architect Agent.

Based on the rules you must follow in the file .milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_architect.md,
generate the coding-agent prompts for work item DEPLOY_BUG_4 of EPIC_2
(section 10 of your rules for a bug, section 10a for a FIX item).

Specification — this is what your prompts must make true:
.milkyflow/agents/devops/reports/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_4.md

This is a DEFECT report, and it is a work item of the EPIC — not of any user story. Its
"Steps to reproduce" and "Expected result" are the specification: QA will re-execute those
steps literally to validate your fix, so the work must make the Expected result hold from a
clean state. Its "## Detected during" field is informational only — never derive a story id,
a path, or any routing decision from it.

Do NOT create a story file for this work item, do NOT write into the Product Owner's
directory, and never consume a US_$j number. Do not edit the report itself: it belongs to the
agent that produced it, and its occurrence history is that agent's record.

Save the prompts under .milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_4/,
one file per task, numbered in execution order, as your rules specify. Generate prompts for
DEPLOY_BUG_4 only — every other work item waits for the QA verdict on this one.

Output

» You are the Software Solution Architect Agent.

Based on the rules you must follow in the file .milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_architect.md,
generate the coding-agent prompts for work item DEPLOY_BUG_4 of EPIC_2
(section 10 of your rules for a bug, section 10a for a FIX item).

Specification — this is what your prompts must make true:
.milkyflow/agents/devops/reports/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_4.md

This is a DEFECT report, and it is a work item of the EPIC — not of any user story. Its
"Steps to reproduce" and "Expected result" are the specification: QA will re-execute those
steps literally to validate your fix, so the work must make the Expected result hold from a
clean state. Its "## Detected during" field is informational only — never derive a story id,
a path, or any routing decision from it.

Do NOT create a story file for this work item, do NOT write into the Product Owner's
directory, and never consume a US_$j number. Do not edit the report itself: it belongs to the
agent that produced it, and its occurrence history is that agent's record.

Save the prompts under .milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_4/,
one file per task, numbered in execution order, as your rules specify. Generate prompts for
DEPLOY_BUG_4 only — every other work item waits for the QA verdict on this one.
… Let me read the relevant files first.
[tool] bash {'command': 'cat /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution
… Let me read the relevant files first.
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_archit
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/devops/reports/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_4.md'}
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_archit
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_archit
Now I have enough context. Let me look at the actual file to understand the exact bug:
[tool] bash {'command': 'grep -n "list_child_folders\\|create_child_folder\\|Bearer" /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backu
… The grep is showing redacted values. Let me look at the actual lines.
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src/backup_cockpit/live_import/clients/passwordcockpit.py'
The grep output shows `f"******"` for all methods — the file viewer is redacting secrets. I need to see the raw bytes to distinguish the literal from the f-string. Let me check via Python:
… The grep is showing redacted values. Let me look at the actual lines.
[tool] bash {'command': 'python3 -c "\nimport dis, importlib.util, sys\nspec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location(\'pc\', \'src/
[tool] bash {'command': 'cd /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper && python3 -c "\nimport dis, importlib.util\nspec = 
[tool] bash {'command': "cd /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper && python3 << 'EOF'\nimport dis, importlib.util\nspe
The bug is clearly described in the report. The viewer is redacting the token expression but the bug is exactly what the report states: two methods use a literal string instead of an f-string for the Authorization header. Let me now look at the tests directory and check existing test files for context:
[tool] bash {'command': 'find /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper -type f -name "*.py" | grep -i "passwordcockpit\\|
[tool] bash {'command': 'ls /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/ 2>/dev/null', '
[tool] bash {'command': 'find /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper -type f -name "*.py" | xargs grep -l "list_child_f
[tool] bash {'command': 'ls /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_BUG_3/', 
[tool] bash {'command': 'grep -n "list_child_folders\\|create_child_folder" /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/test
Now let me look at an existing prompt from BUG_3 for formatting reference, and check what tests exist around the auth header:
… The grep is showing redacted values. Let me look at the actual lines.
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_BUG_3/1_CLIENT_
[tool] bash {'command': 'grep -n "Authorization\\|Bearer\\|_FAKE_TOKEN" /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/tests/un
Let me also check how auth header is asserted in the working tests vs the buggy ones:
… The grep is showing redacted values. Let me look at the actual lines.
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/tests/unit/test_live_import_client.py', 'view_range': [220
I have all the context needed. The fix is a one-liner in the source file; tests exist but don't assert the Authorization header is sent correctly. This is a single focused task. Let me create the prompt:
… The grep is showing redacted values. Let me look at the actual lines.
[tool] bash {'command': 'mkdir -p /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEP
[tool] create {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_4/1_
Done. One prompt file generated at:

```
.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_4/
└── 1_FIX_AUTH_HEADER_FSTRING.md
```

**Rationale for a single task:** the fix is confined to exactly two lines in one file (`passwordcockpit.py`), with two companion regression tests added to the existing test file. There is no contract boundary, no cross-component coordination, and no deployment configuration to change — a single focused coding pass is the correct decomposition per section 6.

**What the prompt instructs the coder to do:**
1. Change the literal `"Bearer "` to the f-string `f"Bearer {token}"` in `list_child_folders` and `create_child_folder`.
2. Add two tests (`test_list_child_folders_sends_bearer_token`, `test_create_child_folder_sends_bearer_token`) that capture the outgoing request via `respx` and assert the `Authorization` header carries the actual token value.
3. Validate with `pytest tests/unit/test_live_import_client.py -v` (must exit 0).
… Now let me verify the file was created and looks good.
[done] exit=0 premium_requests=1 api=122552ms