Files changed

• .milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_5/1_fix_source_client_authorization_header.md

Briefing

You are the Software Solution Architect Agent.

Based on the rules you must follow in the file .milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_architect.md,
generate the coding-agent prompts for work item DEPLOY_BUG_5 of EPIC_2
(section 10 of your rules for a bug, section 10a for a FIX item).

Specification — this is what your prompts must make true:
.milkyflow/agents/devops/reports/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_5.md

This is a DEFECT report, and it is a work item of the EPIC — not of any user story. Its
"Steps to reproduce" and "Expected result" are the specification: QA will re-execute those
steps literally to validate your fix, so the work must make the Expected result hold from a
clean state. Its "## Detected during" field is informational only — never derive a story id,
a path, or any routing decision from it.

Do NOT create a story file for this work item, do NOT write into the Product Owner's
directory, and never consume a US_$j number. Do not edit the report itself: it belongs to the
agent that produced it, and its occurrence history is that agent's record.

Save the prompts under .milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_5/,
one file per task, numbered in execution order, as your rules specify. Generate prompts for
DEPLOY_BUG_5 only — every other work item waits for the QA verdict on this one.

Output

» You are the Software Solution Architect Agent.

Based on the rules you must follow in the file .milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_architect.md,
generate the coding-agent prompts for work item DEPLOY_BUG_5 of EPIC_2
(section 10 of your rules for a bug, section 10a for a FIX item).

Specification — this is what your prompts must make true:
.milkyflow/agents/devops/reports/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_5.md

This is a DEFECT report, and it is a work item of the EPIC — not of any user story. Its
"Steps to reproduce" and "Expected result" are the specification: QA will re-execute those
steps literally to validate your fix, so the work must make the Expected result hold from a
clean state. Its "## Detected during" field is informational only — never derive a story id,
a path, or any routing decision from it.

Do NOT create a story file for this work item, do NOT write into the Product Owner's
directory, and never consume a US_$j number. Do not edit the report itself: it belongs to the
agent that produced it, and its occurrence history is that agent's record.

Save the prompts under .milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_5/,
one file per task, numbered in execution order, as your rules specify. Generate prompts for
DEPLOY_BUG_5 only — every other work item waits for the QA verdict on this one.
… Let me read the relevant files to understand the context.
[tool] bash {'command': 'cat /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution
… Let me read the relevant files to understand the context.
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_archit
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/devops/reports/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_5.md'}
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_archit
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_archit
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src/backup_cockpit/live_import/clients/source_passwordcock
Now I have everything I need. The bug is clear: line 107 uses `f"******"` (literal string, not interpolating `token`). Let me look at the tests directory and existing tests to understand the test pattern.
[tool] bash {'command': 'find /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper -type f -name "*.py" | grep -E "test.*source_passw
[tool] bash {'command': 'find /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper -type f -name "*.py" | grep test | grep -i "source
[tool] bash {'command': 'ls /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/tests/unit/ && ls /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/P
… Let me look at the test_live_import_client.py to understand the test pattern.
[tool] bash {'command': 'grep -n "PasswordCockpitSourceClient\\|list_all_folders\\|source_password" /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody
… Let me look at the test_live_import_client.py to understand the test pattern.
[tool] bash {'command': 'grep -n "PasswordCockpitSourceClient\\|source_passwordcockpit\\|SOURCE" /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Pr
… No tests for PasswordCockpitSourceClient yet. Now I have enough context to write the prompts.

The fix is simple:
1. In `source_passwordcockpit.py`, line 107: change `"******"` to `f"Bearer {token}"` (matching DestinationClient pattern)

Let me check what pattern the destination client uses.
[tool] bash {'command': 'grep -n "Authorization\\|Bearer\\|token" /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src/backup_coc
Now I have all context. The fix is: change `"******"` → `f"Bearer {token}"` on line 107. Let me create the prompt directory and prompt file.
… No tests for PasswordCockpitSourceClient yet. Now I have enough context to write the prompts.

The fix is simple:
1. In `source_passwordcockpit.py`, line 107: change `"******"` to `f"Bearer {token}"` (matching DestinationClient pattern)

Let me check what pattern the destination client uses.
[tool] bash {'command': 'mkdir -p /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEP
[tool] create {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_5/1_
Done. One task prompt generated at:

```
.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_5/
  1_fix_source_client_authorization_header.md
```

**Why one task:** The bug is a single-line defect in one method of one file. The rules (§6) require splitting only at implementation boundaries; a one-file, one-line fix with accompanying unit tests is a single coherent coding task.

**What the prompt asks the coder to do:**
1. **Fix** — replace `"******"` with `f"Bearer {token}"` on the one offending line in `source_passwordcockpit.py`.
2. **Test** — add four unit tests to `test_live_import_client.py` targeting `PasswordCockpitSourceClient.list_all_folders`: header-value assertion (guards against regression), HAL-envelope parse, plain-list parse, and HTTP-error raise.
3. **Validate** — `pytest tests/unit/`, plus two `grep` checks confirming the literal is gone and the correct f-string is present.
[done] exit=0 premium_requests=1 api=99891ms