Run0169_20260809T103352Z
Nodesa_work_item_prompts
RoleSA
Agentcopilot
Result
OK
Started2026-08-09T10:30:49.931037+00:00
Duration182.0s
Files changed1
Commits0
Files changed
- .milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_6/1_FIX_DISCOVERY_BEFORE_BOOTSTRAP.md
Briefing
You are the Software Solution Architect Agent. Based on the rules you must follow in the file .milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_architect.md, generate the coding-agent prompts for work item DEPLOY_BUG_6 of EPIC_2 (section 10 of your rules for a bug, section 10a for a FIX item). Specification — this is what your prompts must make true: .milkyflow/agents/devops/reports/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_6.md This is a DEFECT report, and it is a work item of the EPIC — not of any user story. Its "Steps to reproduce" and "Expected result" are the specification: QA will re-execute those steps literally to validate your fix, so the work must make the Expected result hold from a clean state. Its "## Detected during" field is informational only — never derive a story id, a path, or any routing decision from it. Do NOT create a story file for this work item, do NOT write into the Product Owner's directory, and never consume a US_$j number. Do not edit the report itself: it belongs to the agent that produced it, and its occurrence history is that agent's record. Save the prompts under .milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_6/, one file per task, numbered in execution order, as your rules specify. Generate prompts for DEPLOY_BUG_6 only — every other work item waits for the QA verdict on this one.
Output
» You are the Software Solution Architect Agent.
Based on the rules you must follow in the file .milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_architect.md,
generate the coding-agent prompts for work item DEPLOY_BUG_6 of EPIC_2
(section 10 of your rules for a bug, section 10a for a FIX item).
Specification — this is what your prompts must make true:
.milkyflow/agents/devops/reports/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_6.md
This is a DEFECT report, and it is a work item of the EPIC — not of any user story. Its
"Steps to reproduce" and "Expected result" are the specification: QA will re-execute those
steps literally to validate your fix, so the work must make the Expected result hold from a
clean state. Its "## Detected during" field is informational only — never derive a story id,
a path, or any routing decision from it.
Do NOT create a story file for this work item, do NOT write into the Product Owner's
directory, and never consume a US_$j number. Do not edit the report itself: it belongs to the
agent that produced it, and its occurrence history is that agent's record.
Save the prompts under .milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_6/,
one file per task, numbered in execution order, as your rules specify. Generate prompts for
DEPLOY_BUG_6 only — every other work item waits for the QA verdict on this one.
… Let me read the relevant files to understand the rules and the bug report.
[tool] bash {'command': 'cat /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution
[tool] bash {'command': 'cat /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/devops/reports/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_
… Let me read the relevant files to understand the rules and the bug report.
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_archit
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_archit
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/solution_architect/rules_solution_archit
Now let me inspect the relevant source code to understand the fix required:
[tool] bash {'command': 'find /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/components -type f -name "*.py" | grep -E "(sync|d
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper'}
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src'}
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/components'}
[tool] bash {'command': 'find /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src -type f -name "*.py" | sort', 'description': '
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src/backup_cockpit/live_import/run/orchestrator.py'}
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src/backup_cockpit/live_import/run/discovery.py'}
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src/backup_cockpit/live_import/run/folder_sync.py'}
Now I understand the bug clearly. The `FolderDiscoveryService.discover()` calls `source_client.list_all_folders(token)` which is called BEFORE the destination root is created (bootstrap happens first in orchestrator). But the HTTP trace shows the destination root IS created before discovery completes — actually let me re-read the orchestrator flow:
Looking at the orchestrator:
1. `bootstrap_result = RootFolderBootstrapService().bootstrap(...)` → creates destination root "source-a" (id=8)
2. `tree = FolderDiscoveryService().discover(...)` → reads source folders again
The discovery happens AFTER bootstrap creates the destination root. Since source and destination share the same PC instance, the GET `/api/v1/folders` in discovery now returns id=8 "source-a" too. Then sync adds it as a source folder and creates id=9.
Let me verify by reading the bootstrap service and the source client:
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src/backup_cockpit/live_import/run/bootstrap.py'}
[tool] view {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/src/backup_cockpit/live_import/clients/source_passwordcock
Now I have a complete picture. Let me also check the tests:
[tool] bash {'command': 'find /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/tests -type f -name "*.py" | grep -E "discovery|fo
[tool] bash {'command': 'cat /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/components/backup_cockpit/README.md 2>/dev/null | h
Now I have full understanding of the bug. The fix is clear:
**Root cause**: In `orchestrator.py`, `bootstrap()` creates the destination root BEFORE `discover()` reads source folders. Since source and destination share the same PC instance, the newly created destination root folder is visible to the source client's `list_all_folders()` call — and ends up treated as a source folder, creating a spurious child in the destination.
**Fix**: Move `FolderDiscoveryService().discover()` to happen BEFORE `RootFolderBootstrapService().bootstrap()` in the orchestrator (freeze source tree first, then write to destination).
Let me now create the prompts:
… Let me read the relevant files to understand the bug report and what I need to do.
[tool] bash {'command': 'mkdir -p /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEP
[tool] bash {'command': 'cat /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/tests/unit/test_live_import_orchestrator.py | head
… Let me read the relevant files to understand the bug report and what I need to do.
[tool] bash {'command': 'cat /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/tests/unit/test_live_import_discovery.py | wc -l\nc
Now I have everything I need. Let me generate the prompt. This bug has a single focused fix — reorder discovery before bootstrap in the orchestrator — with a corresponding test update.
[tool] create {'path': '/home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_6/1_
The prompt has been saved. Let me verify it exists and is the only file needed:
[tool] bash {'command': 'ls /home/oem/Documents/Sandbox/Kody/Projects/Backupper/.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BU
Done. One prompt file generated at:
```
.milkyflow/agents/developer/prompts/EPIC_2_DEPLOY_BUG_6/
1_FIX_DISCOVERY_BEFORE_BOOTSTRAP.md
```
---
**Why one task:** The fix is a single focused change in one execution boundary — reordering two service calls in `ImportRunOrchestrator.run()` and propagating the resulting signature change (`backup_parent_id` removed from `discover()`, derived internally, exposed via `DiscoveredTree`). There is no second independent boundary to split on.
**What the prompt specifies:**
1. **`orchestrator.py`** — move `FolderDiscoveryService().discover()` before `RootFolderBootstrapService().bootstrap()`, so the source tree is frozen before any destination write occurs.
2. **`discovery.py`** — remove `backup_parent_id` from the public signature; derive it internally from the raw folder list (external parent heuristic); expose it as `DiscoveredTree.backup_parent_id`.
3. **Tests** — call-order regression test (discover before bootstrap), same-instance no-spurious-folder regression test matching the bug fixture, and discovery unit tests for the new internal derivation (positive + negative).
[done] exit=0 premium_requests=1 api=166573ms